Monday, April 27, 2015

MANAGING IP AS A SET OF BUSINESS ASSETS | WEEK #12

Hey guys!

This blog post is a second installation of Assignment #12. I went online and found some relevant research about IP in terms of using it as a business asset. I will be basing my analysis off of this article from the World Intellectual Property Organization's (WIPO) website:

http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2008/01/article_0008.html

By themselves, business assets have no significant value. This is a fundamental property of intangibles, such as IP - they become valuable only in the context of the business. More specifically, IP and other intangible assets become valuable when their roles in supporting the corporate business strategy are made explicit.

There are 3 main steps to effectively use IP as a strategic business asset:

  1. Define what your company expects to gain from the management of its IP;
  2. Determine the specific roles IP can play in support of your company’s business;
  3. Select and pursue a basic IP strategy to meet these objectives.
DEFINE EXPECTATIONS OF IP MANAGEMENT

When analyzing what a company expects to gain from IP management, there are typically 5 functions that IP as a strategic business asset can serve:
  1. Defensibility - Using IP for defensive purposes and to protect your own innovations only
  2. Cost Control - Still have a defensive approach, but looking to for protection while also trying to minimize the costs of maintaining the IP
  3. Profitability - Companies reach this level when they either license their IP or use it to support a business activity
  4. Integration - IP is integrated across all levels of a company's business activities and is used for a wide range of business roles
  5. Visionary - Management takes a long term view of the IP's role in the companies business activities and in the industry as a whole
DETERMINE WHAT BUSINESS ROLES CAN IP PLAY?

In order to determine what business roles IP can play, first, review the company’s strategic vision and its corporate strategic plan. Then, ask yourself what IP might do to support the company’s business strategy and hasten its journey toward the long-term vision. Thirdly, look at the table and select the IP business roles that seem most applicable to your company.


ObjectivePatentsTrademarksKnow-howRelationships
Conflict avoidance/ resolution
• Protection (exclude others)
• Design freedom
• Cross-licensing (defensive)
• Litigation bargaining power
• Protection (exclude others)
• Protection (trade secret)
n/a
Revenue generation
• Patents: sales, licenses, infringement policing
• Increased bargaining power
• Market penetration
• Increased speed to market
• TM: sales, licenses, co-branding, infringement policing
• Sales, licenses, joint ventures, strategic alliances, integration, increased speed to market
Cost reduction
• Tax donation
• Litigation avoidance
• Access to technology of others
• Improved knowledge transfer
• Litigation avoidance
• Access to technology of others
• Litigation avoidance
• Improved knowledge transfer
• Reduced marketing costs
Strategic position
• Reputation / image
• Competitive blocking
• Barrier to competition
• Consumer/ supplier control
• Optimization of core technology
• Name recognition
• Consumer loyalty
• Barrier to competition
• Joint venture
• Strategic alliance
• Reputation / image
• Barrier to entry
• Reputation / image
• Consumer loyalty
• Barrier to entry

EXTRACTING VALUE FROM IP

There are several ways to extract value from IP once you have finished conducting basic IP growth strategies. There are four basic strategies for IP value maximization and growth, and they should be tailored to the needs of your company:
  1. To minimize risk, focus on process compliance, processing product clearances and protecting innovations in the marketplace. A key activity for those pursuing this strategy is portfolio building and cross-licensing to avoid litigation.
  2. To reduce costs, screen the portfolio to eliminate unnecessary patents, tightening the criteria for protecting innovations with patents, creating a standard country-filing list, minimizing exceptions, tightening internal review processes, and aligning the trademarks and brands with products.
  3. To maximize business and legal value, seek to profit from direct use of the IP itself, rather than only through the products and services protected by the IP.
  4. To maximize strategic value, focus on utilizing IP to change the nature or direction of competition, relying on strategic patenting, refocusing R&D and rethinking partnerships with customers, suppliers, or any other relevant parties.
Once you have maximized the value of an IP, there are only 6 ways to convert it directly into cash:
  1. Sell it
  2. License it out
  3. Use it as the basis for a joint venture (to provide access to needed physical assets)
  4. Use it as the basis for a strategic alliance (to gain access to markets you may otherwise be denied)
  5. Use it to protect products and services in order to extract premium prices for them
  6. Create and spin-out a new company based on the IP

THE ROLE OF IP AS A BUSINESS ASSET | WEEK #12

Hey guys,

So this week I will be discussing a presentation we viewed in class about the role of intellectual property as a strategic business asset. Thank you to Efrat Kasznik, Founder & President of the Foresight Valuation Group, for giving this presentation!

--

IP MARKETPLACE OVERVIEW
  • Today, intangible assets comprise 80% of the S&P 500's market value, and intellectual property is playing an increasingly larger role within a variety of industries:
    • Consumer Products vs. Digital Products
      • Consumer products today are very easily patentable if they meet the criteria we discussed early on in the course
      • However, Supreme Court decisions consistently rule that you cannot patent software or digital products
        • The idea is that you cannot patent software because it is based on algorithms that already exist, so there is nothing proprietary about software
  • A look at the comparison of IP rights shows that there are for types of IPs:
    • Copyrights
      • Original works of authorship
      • Automatic protection for the author's life + 70 years
    • Trademarks
      • Word, name, or symbol used to distinguish goods
      • No expiration as long as it is used commercially
    • Trade Secrets
      • Business information that has economic value and is kept confidential
      • Indefinite lifetime value
    • Patents
      • A right to exclude others from producing, using, or selling a product covered by invention in a defined territory
      • Lifetime of 20 years from the filing date
  • The mobile patent wars serve as an example of the ever-increasing size of the IP marketplace
    • Currently, 250,000 patents are going into smartphones, and that number continues to grow
    • Over the course of the last few years, server multi-billion dollar deals have taken place for IP acquisition (i.e. Google purchases Motorola Mobility)
  • The IP marketplace is currently being impacted by 4 key external forces:
    • IP litigation is at an all-time high
    • Patent transaction markets are currently very active
    • Global competition is changing the IP playing field
    • And the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is both overloaded and underfunded
      • This is largely due to the America Invests Act (AIA), which moved patents from a first to invent to a first to file system 
  • The IP market place features more than just patent holders and patent users - there now exists an intermediary known as a non-practicing entity (NPE), which we discussed in previous blog posts
--

IP STRATEGY FOR GROWTH
  • Sources of intellectual property include:
    • Internal research and development
    • Manufacturing
    • Marketing
  • There are 5 main types of IP transactions:
    • Use internally
    • License
    • Sale
    • Joint venture/spin off
    • Enforcement
  • The idea is to eventually grow an IP over the course of its life cycle into a strategic business asset
    • Develop an IP position
      • Innovators and technology enthusiasts adopt IP
      • Early adopters and visionaries do so as well
    • Portfolio commercialization and monetization
      • Early majority pragmatists
      • Late majority conservatives
    • Portfolio liquidation
      • Laggards and skeptics
  • Goals to consider when growing an IP portfolio to maximize valuation
    • Freedom to operate
    • Block competitors
    • Support future products
    • Hedge against litigation
    • Attract buyers and investors
    • Monetization
    • Liquidation value
--

IP CASE STUDIES

Xerox: Xerox's failure to patent the Graphical User Interface (GUI) led to a loss in a half billion dollars in royalties from Mac and PC sales

Kodak: Infringed on 7 out of 12 of Polaroids patents instead of creating innovative new technology led to a loss of $3 billion


PATENT TED TALKS | LESSONS FROM FASHION'S FREE CULTURE | WEEK #11

Hey guys!

Below is the second installation of my favorite Ted Talk videos about patents. Similarly to the last video I analyzed, this video also discusses the benefits of shared intellectual property to the progress of useful art. Enjoy!

--

Johanna Blakley: Lessons from Fashion's Free Culture:

THE SITUATION

Blakley begins by telling a story about Italian fashion designer Miuccia Prada. Prada, finds a jacket while shopping with her friend in Paris and begins to analyze the seams and the design. She says she will buy the jacket, but she's also going to copy it. Is this stealing? Or is the fact that she can find the one jacket through the archives of fashion history that will become relevant again indicative of her genius?

--

COPYRIGHT LAWS IN THE FASHION INDUSTRY

Is illegal for Prada to copy another person's work/design? In the fashion industry, its not! There is actually very little intellectual property protection in the fashion industry other than trademark protection. This means that anybody can copy any garment on anyone in the world and sell it on their own design. This is because the courts decided long ago that apparel is too utilitarian for copyright protection.

--

INCENTIVE TO INNOVATE

But without ownership, is there really any incentive to innovate? Blakley argues that because there is no copyright protection in the fashion industry, there is a very open and creative ecology of creativity in the industry. This allows them to sample from their peers' designs and have the broadest pallet imaginable of any industry. This "culture of copying" allows for the establishment of trends, allowing for both a top-down and bottom-up type of industry.

--

HOW DO THE GIANTS STAY IN BUSINESS?

If there is no copyright protection on designs, and smaller companies can make knockoff designs for a cheaper price, how do giant luxury brands continue to dominate the market? Blakley states that this phenomenon occurs because their customers are not counterfeit customers.

--

THE VIRTUES OF COPYING

  • Democratization of fashion
  • Faster establishment of global trends
  • Induced obsolescence
  • Acceleration in creative innovation
This culture of copying at the end of the day has forced many fashion designers to be more innovative in order to stay competitive. When you are forced to make designs to difficult to copy, you are spurring top-notch innovation. Self-copying is also becoming a common trend.

--

COPYING CULTURE IS REVOLUTIONARY

At the end of the day, industries with low copyright protection, such as food, automobiles, and fashion, have much higher gross sales than industries with high copy right protection, such as movies and books.


PATENT TED TALKS | EMBRACE THE REMIX | WEEK #11

Hey Patent Pals!

Thanks to Abigail for teaching the class last week! I think the Ted Talk videos we watched were extremely interesting and helped put a lot of the work we have been doing in class into some real-world context. For this week's assignment, we are responsible for discussing two of the videos and providing our opinions as well as an analysis of the position of the speaker. Below is the post for my first favorite video - stay tuned for a blog post on my second favorite!

Kirby Ferguson: Embracing the Remix

THE SITUATION

Imagine we are in 1964 and Bob Dylan has reached the climax of his career - he is producing sensational hits at a rapid pace and has been regarded as the "voice of a generation". There is a small group of dissenters, however, who believe that Dylan is stealing his music from old songs.

Now we are back in 2004, and Danger Mouse has taken The Beatles' The White Album and combined it with Jay-Z's The Black Album to produce The Grey Album. The Beatles company sends out countless cease and desist letters for "unfair competition and dilution of [their] valuable property".

--

REMIX: COPY, TRANSFORM, AND COMBINE

Remixes take place when you copy the components of multiple songs, alter them, and combine them to make something more unique. However, Ferguson argues that these are not just the basic building blocks for remixes, but for all of creativity in general.

Everything is a remix.

--

EXAMPLES IN THE REAL WORLD

He believes that this is a better way to conceive of creativity. Current patent laws run counter to this fact by using the idea of "property" as an analogy.

Ford: But even Henry Ford once said that he "invented nothing new" - he acknowledges that he assembled the inventions of other men that were created centuries before his idea had ever been conceived.

Apple: With the invention of the iPhone, the world saw the implementation of "multi-touch" technology in a commercially accessible product, even though it had been around for decades prior to the launch of the iPhone.

--

CONTRADICTION OF PATENT LAW

Ferguson then argues that patent is inherently contradicting its true intent - to promote the progress of useful art. Picasso always had a saying - "good artists copy, great artists steal." And as exemplified by Apple CEO Steve Jobs, this is a very easy mantra to abide by until your idea is being stolen. This is why the contradiction in patent law exists. Though "everything is a remix" seems inherently obvious, in actuality, people are very skeptical about giving up their valuable intellectual property for the betterment of society and the progress of useful art. This is called "loss aversion" - we have a strong predisposition to protect what we believe is ours.



Monday, April 6, 2015

SILLY PATENTS | SNAKE WALKER | WEEK #10

Hey everybody!

For the second installation of this week's silly patents discussion, I have included the Snake Walker below:


Claim: A collar for collaring a snake has an elongated collar section forming a physical collar when wrapped around the body portion of the snake. The collar further has a support section for supporting an attachment mechanism for accepting attachment of a tether and a connector system comprising at least two components affixed to strategic portions of the collar section for securing the collar in place around the body portion of the snake. The length of the collar section is such that a portion thereof overlaps itself when fitted around the snake providing an adjustable interface containing separate components of the connector system whereby mating the connector components together. secures the collar in place on the snake. In one embodiment the collar apparatus further includes a concertina movement-neutralization device for reducing concertina movement through the collar.

Analysis: The Snake Walker effectively serves as a leash for a pet snake. With regards to prior art infringement, this apparatus clearly infringes on the same leashes that allow us to walk dogs. The only difference is the length of the leash and the circumference of the collar, but both of these factors seem obvious, in that a POSITA would know to adjust the size of the leash to the size of the animal. This patent should never have been approved!



SILLY PATENTS | LEAF CHAPS | WEEK #10

Hey guys!

I think this week's assignment should be a lot of fun for most of us! The assignment was basically to find 2 silly patents, and discuss the claims along with how the patent relates to obviousness, anticipation, or prior art infringment. My first patent is a pretty funny one - it is a patent for an invention called "Leaf Chaps".


Claim: A leaf gathering trouser comprised of a pair of flexible leg stalls and a flexible net, said net attached at opposing side edges to cooperating portions of the leg stalls and substantially occupying a space between the leg stalls in order to make contact with loose leaves located upon a ground surface and to accumulate said leaves into a pile for disposal while a user is wearing the leg stalls and walking in a normal manner. The net, comprised of a web section and a solid section, can be permanently attached to the leg stalls or releasably attached thereto by means of cooperating rows of zippers and zipper heads.


Analysis: Though nets and pants are both obvious, I do not think that the invention of Leaf Chaps is obvious, nor have I found any prior art that may infringe on the patent. The reasoning for this is simple, however - the idea provides limited functional benefits, in addition to health and safety concerns. Who knows what crawls beneath and between the leaves in your backyard - do you really want that making its way up your pants as well?

I hope you all enjoyed this patent! Stay tuned for another silly patent on my blog this week!